<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Directory Submission, Automatic or Manual?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.templatepanic.com/articles/directory-submission-automatic-or-manual/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.templatepanic.com/articles/directory-submission-automatic-or-manual</link>
	<description>Free Tutorials, Resources, WordPress Themes, and Blogger Templates.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:34:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Directory Submission Service</title>
		<link>http://www.templatepanic.com/articles/directory-submission-automatic-or-manual#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>Directory Submission Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.templatepanic.com/?p=1149#comment-942</guid>
		<description>Nice article, thanks. Submissions done manually to web directories have higher chance of acceptance when we select the right category matching the website contents.  Manual Directory Submission can give you better results because you can rotate the anchor text and description, so that your backlinks would appear natural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, thanks. Submissions done manually to web directories have higher chance of acceptance when we select the right category matching the website contents.  Manual Directory Submission can give you better results because you can rotate the anchor text and description, so that your backlinks would appear natural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeet</title>
		<link>http://www.templatepanic.com/articles/directory-submission-automatic-or-manual#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.templatepanic.com/?p=1149#comment-944</guid>
		<description>Good points about manual submissions. Automated software are often bad at rotating titles / descriptions. They are worse at choosing categories and wouldn&#039;t work with captcha enabled directories.

Another thing that automated software are not good at is determining whether a directory is free. They often turn paid after a couple of months of operation and softwares just don&#039;t have the intelligence. Most software I have seen would only work with phpld / esyndicate and other popular directory scripts but fail miserably when they come across custom scripts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points about manual submissions. Automated software are often bad at rotating titles / descriptions. They are worse at choosing categories and wouldn&#8217;t work with captcha enabled directories.</p>
<p>Another thing that automated software are not good at is determining whether a directory is free. They often turn paid after a couple of months of operation and softwares just don&#8217;t have the intelligence. Most software I have seen would only work with phpld / esyndicate and other popular directory scripts but fail miserably when they come across custom scripts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deks</title>
		<link>http://www.templatepanic.com/articles/directory-submission-automatic-or-manual#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>deks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.templatepanic.com/?p=1149#comment-940</guid>
		<description>manual directory submission is best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>manual directory submission is best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Directory Submission</title>
		<link>http://www.templatepanic.com/articles/directory-submission-automatic-or-manual#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Directory Submission</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.templatepanic.com/?p=1149#comment-941</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Directory Submission...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thanks, Great post! Your title Useful Tools for Directory Owners was interesting. Found it today while searching for Directory Submission in Google......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Directory Submission&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thanks, Great post! Your title Useful Tools for Directory Owners was interesting. Found it today while searching for Directory Submission in Google&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.templatepanic.com/articles/directory-submission-automatic-or-manual#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.templatepanic.com/?p=1149#comment-943</guid>
		<description>Interesting article.  I can see the value of using a manual service to do this as it&#039;s very time consuming.  But does Google still value links from Directories as much as they used to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article.  I can see the value of using a manual service to do this as it&#8217;s very time consuming.  But does Google still value links from Directories as much as they used to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

